-
Posts
7,142 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by Clunkmeister
-
Yes, the power turrets were only removed after the threat of enemy air attack fell to nothing. Most kept waist and tail guns for that purpose. Unless you intend on doing yours with the waist windows removed, don’t worry about super detailing that area inside. You’ll literally see nothing. The kit isn’t anywhere near as refined as the A-20, but it’s still quite buildable.
-
Rob, there was no astrodome. The B-25 didn’t use them. They instead used the top turret as an astrodome, and when the turret was removed, some units, not all, cobbled a simple bubble in. The top turrets were removed late in the war, as were all non forward firing fixed guns to save weight and add fuel. The engines and cowls aren’t horrible, IF you use the kit parts. Instead, I replaced the gearboxes with AMS Resin (now owned and operated by BiggTim) castings and corrected propeller blades. They are a complicated subassembly though and you have to be careful. The engine cowls are the only tricky part of the build. If you build OOB, the rest of the kit falls together. Very little detail in the main fuselage, but with the waist glass in place, you can’t see anything inside anyway. Just remember, I’m building a modified version of the H. Plenty of Marine add ons and changes. If you build mostly OOB, you can easily build one and finish in time. Grab some 3D panel decals, corrected props, and resin wheels, and go for it! I recommend the kit as they really look the part when complete.
-
The engines were unholy, black hearted devices that had me mumbling to myself again and again. Despite paying special attention to what went where, the cowl panels struck me as being designed and drawn by the love child of Dr. Strangelove and Helen Keller. THIS is after half an hour of rough smoothing. Polishing and rescribing to follow.
-
A search for something to use as a suitable astrodome was unsuccessful, so a B-24 clear Sprue was sourced from eBay and the B-24 astrodome was liberated from the spare sprue. It falls to reason that because the B-24 was well used by all Services in the PTO, replacement astrodomes were in stock at depots and some enterprising Gunny may have facilitate some 5 finger discounts followed by some semi unofficial midnight logistics operations.
-
Excellent, Carl! Thank You!! That's a HUGE miss. Not hard to fix, but if you assumed the design was finalized when places into production,. you'd have no clue about it. I take it the door is only on one side of the nacelle? Hard to believe I've never finished this kit. It really is a glorious thing, although those engines kicked my butt.
-
Revell He 111 P - FINISHED!!
Clunkmeister replied to ScottsGT's topic in The Great Twins Broup Bluild
Looking GREAT, Scott! It’s hard to believe that the old 111 served in military service well into the 1960s with a few Nations. It was certainly a solid design, if not all that aesthetically appealing. -
How can I express my feelings about this? Well, let’s see…. ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ When he traded in his Bamboo Bomber for a 310 (yes, Cessna was a major sponsor of the show, back when personal airplanes were actually affordable), I cried…. But I did a lot of hours in 310s, so I get it.. Looking forward to seeing the old Bamboo Bomber, or the “Useless 78” is what I also remember, come together. As an aside with the Bamboo Bomber, the RCAF used a ton of these in its BCATP program through WW2, and many used wooden fixed pitch props. On a nice, hot muggy Saskatchewan summer afternoon, an engine failure in one on takeoff with full fuel and a plane load of trainees must have made for some interesting moments.
-
- 171 replies
-
- 10
-
I’m going on record as saying that the HK A-20 is miles ahead of the HK B-25 in engineering and thoughtful assembly. Building the engines on this kit has to be one of the most miserable jobs I’ve ever accomplished on a 1/32 model. Ever. They are incredibly goofy, have twice the number of pushrods as a thallus required for an R2600 (or any pushrod engine) needs to operate reliably for thousands of hours, AND, when you go to assemble the cowl, you find out the engine is too big. I already knew this so I simply didn’t attach the rocker boxes, and they fit just fine. Cut off the pushrods on the rear set of each row, but use the center rings because they’re needed for correct spacing. Plus, don’t shirk on the rear of the engine because the cowl flaps are open and the rear of the rear row is visible. Then, as soon as you’re done and patting yourself on the back, you realize you gotta do it all over again.
-
- 171 replies
-
- 12
-
The 345th preferred the strafers, and didn't have alot of success with the gunships. Their units were absolutely devastating on the enemy with low level gun attacks, and pretty much wrote the book on tactics on fighting the B-25 as a low level attack aircraft. With decent overhead P-38 support against Japanese fighters, they could concentrate, and many targets didn't need to be revisited until rebuilt. They HAD mistakenly attributed the big gun to loose rivets, panels, etc, until they started having the same issues with the J strafers. Removal of, or limited use of the package guns helped the airframe fatigue situation greatly. The big gun's biggest issue was the slow rate of fire. But the gunship was absolutely tailor made for Marine Corps badassery.
-
PBJ-1H underwing recognition lights when radar pod added.
Clunkmeister replied to Clunkmeister's topic in AIRCRAFT
But it doesn’t say what the Marines did to the three recognition lights under the right wingtip after they installed the radome on the wingtip. I’m curious if they relocated them or just never reinstalled them -
Now the wife is up to….Now a cancer thread.
Clunkmeister replied to ScottsGT's topic in General Discussion
That right there is mighty impressive. -
Now the wife is up to….Now a cancer thread.
Clunkmeister replied to ScottsGT's topic in General Discussion
Probably so, Scott. And with proper adjustment, the bindings would have released before her body rolled past the snapping point. I always absolutely refused to rent boots and skis. -
Now the wife is up to….Now a cancer thread.
Clunkmeister replied to ScottsGT's topic in General Discussion
You said the magic words. "Port" As in the kind that comes in a jug. Just get a straw -
Now the wife is up to….Now a cancer thread.
Clunkmeister replied to ScottsGT's topic in General Discussion
On Christmas Day, 1985 I did exactly the same thing. Was at the Zermatt resort for a week over Christmas and did me a freeze frame skip job down one of the one of straight sections. Face first. Freaking HURT. But Blessings, they were my OWN boots and bindings, which I had purchased at the PX so I had them dialed in pretty good, and both bindings released and the skis flipped off the moment my lips touched down. The old face looked like 40 miles of bad road. It's better to crash at speed than the low speed wipe out. Usually it's better for one's lower legs. I Hope she recovers quickly. I've seen some nasty green stick fractures from skiing accidents. I'm actually surprised her ankle let go. With properly fitted boots, her ankle should have been fine, but her lower leg and possibly her knee might have been worse off. If renting, always go a bit light on the settings, and adjust the weight settings accordingly. I'd rather lose a ski and wipe out than wipe out and not lose my skiis. -
Now the wife is up to….Now a cancer thread.
Clunkmeister replied to ScottsGT's topic in General Discussion
How absolutely RUDE of her!!!