-
Posts
2,579 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Posts posted by HubertB
-
-
-
Great result. Well done !
Below is what I have been up to since the beginning of the year :
Hubert
- 6
-
Soooo .... everyone will clear some space for the big Lanc ... and then one of us will get Peter’s BD-5 kit instead
Hubert
(PS : not to demean Peter’s gift, this is some really cool little subject )
- 5
-
Yummy ! Krakowska !
Good news is I am going to see some Polish friends tonight, and they have some (plus the liquid stuff that goes well with it )
Hubert
- 4
-
2 minutes ago, BlrwestSiR said:
More than the number of F-35s...
Oooohhh...this one is really below the belt ....
Hubert
- 5
-
The smaller base is better proportioned, but, if I may, I would offset the pic so that the crash location does not fall just under the Wellington rear fuselage.
Hubert
- 1
-
Yes, these rivets lines do not look too accurate, Ernie ... nor do the markings on the top right corner ...
Hubert
- 4
-
If the criterion to enter this raffle is "I NEED more kits" or conversely "My stash is too full already", then I am not sure any of us should enter the raffle ...
Hubert
- 6
-
Beautiful work !
Hubert
- 1
-
Not exactly in your budget - more like 300 $, although there may be some good promotions for it around Christmas - , but the Silhouette Cameo is a versatile tool, and good for most modelling uses.
Alternatively, the Curio has some nice additional features, like a second head, the capacity to cut thicker material like thin plastic sheet, and even an embossing feature (rivets lines anyone ?). Its downside is that it is limited in size (roughly to an A4 format) when the Cameo has theoretically unlimited length for 30cms width.
Whichever you choose, I strongly recommend the « Pro » software option. Whereas the embedded basic software can do what you want, the « Pro » option allows to import vector files drawn under another software. A nice feature, even with the basic software, is the vectorising capacity, starting from a pixelated image, like a .jpeg pic.
HTH
Hubert
- 1
-
Will you correct the wrong windscreen / canopy ? It’s really one of the inaccuracies that spoil the look of this kit, whether poeple looking at it are kowledgeable or not about things aircraft
Hubert
- 3
-
It really depends whether you want functional hinges, or simulated ones. The best simulation is then some plastic strips scored regularly ... Alternatively, I believe Archer have a decal sheet with simulated relief piano hinges.
Hubert
-
Although hand-carving your own wooden propeller from laminated veneer is not as dauting as it appears, these ones are really nice and, like all AM, make improving a kit so much easier than a home-made solution.
I, for one, am waiting for my order from Proper Plane. It’s a « package » for my Junkers D-1, with the prop shown here and a Rexx exhaust
Hubert
- 2
-
A company called Microdesign have some 1/35 cowling hinges in PE, like here :
Hubert
- 1
-
Agreed. Nice review of what looks like a vey nice kit.
Hubert
- 2
-
Just teasing you, Maru...
And a proper retribution for a young man that sees fit to torture the eyesight of its elder siblings
Hubert
- 2
-
What ? There is a 1/32 Banshee ?
Hubert
- 1
-
Last time I saw this one, it was not about AMK's F-14 D, but about Trumpeter's TBD
Hubert
- 5
-
Be careful with these books ads pop-ups ...
Three months ago, I had one and paid USD 50 to order the book « How to swindle people using the internet ».
I have not received anything yet. Should I worry ?
Hubert
- 6
-
On 11/30/2018 at 4:40 AM, Clunkmeister said:
Smitty, I’m well past 50 and certain parts of my body don’t respond as they nice did. So I hopped about on my right leg while holding my left leg as straight out as I could, for as long as I could. I expect that visual gets the point across!
Hat book is one seriously good reference, but no real three views...
1) I have the book also, although I paid slightly more than 25 CDN ...
2) I must have somewhere some 5-view drawings from Aviation Week, of all the versions on top of it. No telling how (if any) accurate these are however
Hubert
- 4
-
56 minutes ago, Maxim said:
I was referring to the kit overall. Not saying it's not a nice kit and years ahead of the Hasegawa kit but getting the decals incorrect, panel lines incorrect etc is a sign of bad research or rushing the kit out the door. Trumpeter are another culprit for this as well and usually worse though they do have some beautiful kits like the Avenger etc. No kit is ever correct and that's why we are modellers.
Considering that they announced the TBD in 2006, and we are still waiting for it, I would say Trumpeter are not rushing their releases ...
Just my
Hubert
- 4
-
Very nice !
Hubert
- 1
-
Outstanding, as usual ...
Hubert
- 3
-
One other word of warning. Unfortunately, there are many issues with the Trumeter kit, like the too short fuselage, the too wide windscreen and canopy, which also implies a too wide dorsal spine, the too wide ventral tank, the too pinched rear fuselage at the level of the exhausts. You can decide to live with most of these, but one you will stumble on, and cannot avoid adressing, is the 5 mm gap between the intake ring and the intake pipes under the cockpit.
The good news is that, if you move forward the whole pipes to avoid the gap with the front ring, you will also correct the wrong position of the nose ger compartment, which is too far back on the kit. You will just need to check the fit with the cockpit tub above ...
Hubert
- 3
1st LSM Christmas Raffle (list updated)
in General Discussion
Posted
As soon as the reeinders are back in the stable, groomed and fed ...
Hubert