Jump to content

Clunkmeister

Administrators
  • Posts

    7,142
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Clunkmeister

  1. The operative word for me is “one”. I certainly won’t be building or buying more than that.
  2. It has a much bigger following today than when new.
  3. Most of the original Canadian purchase are pretty much used up by now. 30 years of NORAD alert duty and combat ops in Sand Land have pretty much wore them out.
  4. Like here’s an example that was forwarded to me. Postwar Canadian wingtip position lights. Many were questioning the formation lights on the wingtips. Postwar Canadian for sure. Not sure about others. Some scratchbuilding required.
  5. Thanks Rick. Not on the level of your unbelievable Tempest, but I never planned it to be. I’m pretty darned happy so far. Finding the little differences and ring shown postwar modifications are much fun on this build.
  6. Let’s just hope WNW follows up on the Dambusters/Barnes Wallis theme and gives us that Wellington. It would certainly be a logical next step, assuming that there's anything really logical about large two and four engine bomers in 1/32..... Personally, I love the HK Lanc, but for different reasons. Unintentionally I expect, it’s about 95% postwar already. As in metal clad elevators, certain cockpit details, etc. Yes it’s got it’s warts, but it’s decent and a fun build. It remains to be seen with WNW, but I’ll build one up OOB as soon as it hits. You on the F-111 is like me on a two seat Voodoo. I’d be in delirious delight. Same with a GOOD modern short nose 190. As you can see, posting pics here is simplicity in itself. As for me, I grabbed the F-18 from Carl. Shipping was much cheaper to Tx. I smell an RCAF B model coming. Plus, I’ve been on a book binge lately. With Martin on hiatus, I’ll now need to learn to do my own research.
  7. Dale, that looks bloody decent! I’ve always struggled with 1/72 fighters. My heavy hand screws them up to where they look like cartoons.
  8. I was thinking “Empire” flying boat, but I guess the Sunderland’s more or less the same thing. You, Sir, have gone on one serious spending spree. I have the A-12, and it’s basically your kit with an add-on set and addendum to the instruction booklet. Where the fuel tank sits behind the cockpit now sits a second pit.
  9. Rog, when you write a post, look down and you’ll see “click to choose files”. Just hit that and it accesses your pictures on your device. Upload them directly from there. then hit “post reply”, and poof! You’re there.
  10. Or a KITTY HAWK P-39 would be right up your alley... That kit kicked MY arse
  11. Rick, this kit’s fought you from the first day you cut plastic. Awesome job, sir!
  12. So by the weekend you’ll be done. Do you delay the choice by three days. John, I’d say an HPH L-39 would be just the ticket........
  13. You know it, Harv. Little Feat's the best band of all time!
  14. Yep! I'll start on it tonight. Yopu, sir, are a lifesaver. Some fairly fertile minds have been trying to find some clear reference pics on these.
  15. Dennis, YOU DA MAN!!!! now I've got to dig out my P-61 and see if those are in there somewhere.... Those are the ones, that's for sure. I guess it stands to reason that a postwar Canada would Americanize their equipment as much as needed, and honestly, that's the one single avenue I hadn't investigated. Did you say there might be some AM versions of these out there somewhere? I'm quite happy to scratch them, but if a small company makes them, I'll support them.
  16. hahahahaha "It's not like there isn't anything on my bench at the moment". That, my friend, is the absolute Mother of All Understatements. (as I look at the latest, greatest picture of Carl's bench)
  17. I personally don’t know a single person who has bought one from Squadron
×
×
  • Create New...