FME erk

If I get this right Ernie, you are going to build '104' ?? This is the first time I have seen the word 'RESCUE' on the bomb doors . . . There must have been several changes in the livery of these aircraft I really would need to determine the actual period date I was working to ??? Good luck with the seat alterations David

I know its not an aircraft but its certainly not an AFV but it does relate to the 32nd Lancaster that I intend to build once the workbench is clear, (one needs a lot of space ) I have also built some engine trestles to compliment the Lancaster build Thanks for looking in David

Any updates Nigel or is it all transferred to Youtube vids ??

Jeff Conversely DNCO means it wasnt carried out . . . . NOT Some great info on the Canuck Post-war Lancaster activities. I am gathering that you were there Jeff ?

How you getting on with this Bill ? Is there a blanking plate for the top turret with the conversion set ? Have you decide which of the Dambusting aircraft it will finish as ? David

Jeff Would the front turret have been stripped of ALL equipment as well ?. I can appreciate No guns in the turrets but there is not even the framework visible in the rear turret . . .

That rear turret looks totally devoid of any equipment ???? Was it still operational when the photo was taken does anybody know ?? David

You can seen in one of the photos above, Starboard view, that she had a Martin turret and its faired over . . . . David

Fantastic set of reference photos and this should be a joy to watch. I admire your choice for as you rightly pointed out, MOST folks are into the wartime version so this will be oh so bright !! Good luck with the conversion and the window filling . . . David

. . . and I have just ordered mine :-)

Excellent review I must say. Many thanks, I shall add it to my 'to have' list. David

Do we only get one PHOTO ??

Rather strange reply because you have given two lots of information for ME699 . . . KM-T and ZN-O ???????

Cranky These are the details I have for ME648 . . . examination date April 1944. Lancaster Mk.1 Bomb-aimer blister, large with the '00' in the perspex Cockpit blister both sides Paddles bladed propellers New style pitot head No Rebecca aerial and No fuselage windows H2S fitted Window chute fitted I hope this helps David

I don't intend to show the engines even though it will be displayed as an aircraft at dispersal.

You are a star Bill, particularly helpful with the photo references. many thanks

Bill Can you determine if the engine cowlings can be built up without the engines being assembled ? ie. still insert the propeller on a pivot thro the piece that goes at the front of the cowling ? ? David

I think that that type of wing tip lights were not common. I have seen them ooccasionally on wartime Lancs but generally they are in the minority. This just proves the value of research into your particular Lancaster you wish to model. I am interested where 'Dark Victory' comes from i.e. Which Squadron ?

For a wartime aircraft those external lights are wrong. Wartime aircraft only had One light contained within the clear wing tip(s) Red/Green to the front as ID and White lights at the rear for formation lights David

This will be a first I think . . . . good luck with the conversion ! I have already ticked the 'Follow' button I used to live along the flight path into Scampton but back then it was the great noisy Vulcans of 617 Squadron David

Wow a David Brown tractor !! that coupled with some bomb trolleys that are currently under consideration . . . that will be another £100 towards the completion of the Lancaster

Dont forget that the MK.X had a different flight-engineers panel. AS its clearly seen through the cockpit this would need changing ???? Its clearly displayed in the Pilots & Flight Engineers Notes publication David

Yrjo The chap who made the Dambuster set is here . . . http://www.iconicair.com/home/ You can use the 'Contact@ button/tab to get in touch and ask . . . David

The Phantom is one of 'my' girls. Yes needle props, fuselage windows and a standard B/A blister. No H2s either IIRC. Is it the 100 Squadron or 550 version ?? I am not at home right now but will later post a profile and details if that is what you are after ?? David

I do wonder how many mm difference there is between the two intake at this scale ? Anyhow, can we really have a Lancaster this big sat on display without something holding it back ?? Thought I would create these essential items, the 32nd figure gives some idea how large they need to be . . .