Wingco57 Posted June 5, 2016 Share Posted June 5, 2016 Oh yes, That really looks like it should. Great work. Cees Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainly28s Posted June 5, 2016 Share Posted June 5, 2016 Absolutely amazing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThomasProbert Posted June 5, 2016 Author Share Posted June 5, 2016 Cheers for the compliments, chaps. Today I have completed the cockpit roof area - it's had a spray of filler-primer which has hidden the multitude of sins below: And with some fine tweaking of the cockpit bulkhead... The section fits a treat... ...if you ignore the big gaps that is. But they'll disappear when it's fitted properly, he says hopefully. I'm pleased to have got this part out of the way - it was worrying me as getting the cockpit right is critical in getting the character of the real aircraft. I'm confident that when I've added the observer's glazing atop the nose section it'll look acceptable. The real fun will be the glazing itself, but 'Tigger' Wilkes has come to the rescue and supplied me with three of his canopies for his 1/32nd Lancaster which I can cut up to drop the glass areas in later in the build. Until next time, Tom 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wingco57 Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 You hit the nail on the head by stating that it is the character that's important. That's how I feel too. The Tamiya Lancaster for example failed miserably in that class regarding the windscreen and nose section. However impressive it (still) is. Cees 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThomasProbert Posted July 23, 2016 Author Share Posted July 23, 2016 I haven't had any time at the bench to work on this project, but thought I'd share some 3D printing that's been helping with this build... I'm indebted to Kev67 for his help here - he's done some beautiful prints of the main wheels: And the engine nacelles, exhausts and spinners: And after a gentle sand and priming: In sort, this'll save a whole lot of complex scratch-building Tom 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wingco57 Posted July 24, 2016 Share Posted July 24, 2016 It does. Those parts are really nice and really give your project a boost. I haven't touched the Mancunian in a month. Cees 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThomasProbert Posted August 2, 2016 Author Share Posted August 2, 2016 Afternoon all - time for a long over-due update on the Shackleton project... I've recently been focusing on the nose section where the observer/gunner sat: On the AEW2s the 20mm cannon were removed but the seat remained. This was on a stilt-like structure which was raised above the bombaimer's window below, which when in it's MR2 guise gave him access to the bomb sight fitted below. I scratch-built this from plastic card and Milliput, and pictures showed some nice leather upholstery so stitching was replicated with a rivet wheel while the Milliput was still wet: With the interior of the nose being black, and very little being visible with the seat in situ, I haven't bothered to detail this area and it would be a waste of time. Here's a test fitting of the seat which sat below the transparency: Next I made a roof section for the flattish area on the top of the nose from 1mm plastic card, and added the more curved sides from plastic card 'planks': This was then blended in with automotive filler: After this was all sanded smooth I began working on the upper fairing: More 'planking': An initial sand to remove any rough edges: More automotive filler: Halford's filler-primer applied and a good rub down with some fine grade sandpaper: And finally I had a passable resemblance to the real thing: Slowly but surely, what started out as a 'let's give this a go and see how we get on project' is starting to come together: The gun turret itself still needs to made, but that can wait for another day. Until next time... Tom 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wingco57 Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 Good to see an update Tom, That fairing looks really good and adds to the Shack's character. Cees Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThomasProbert Posted August 2, 2016 Author Share Posted August 2, 2016 Good to see an update Tom, That fairing looks really good and adds to the Shack's character. Cees Many thanks, Cees. It's another very distinctive part of the aircraft, and if wrong would spoil the whole look of the model. I'm confident it'll pass as it is... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GusMac Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 That looks great Tom. As you say it just adds so much character to the look of the plane. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThomasProbert Posted August 5, 2016 Author Share Posted August 5, 2016 Two updates in the space of a week? Wow - I'm back in the groove I've been focusing on the inboard engine nacelles in the last few sessions at the bench - as well as the plans I have there's also plenty of information on the 'net, too. Check out this beautifully detailed image of the St Mawgan MR2 gate-guardian being disassembled ready for a brighter future (picture courtesy of the RAF news website) Notice how the firewalls are not circular as I had always presumed - this would have to be carefully replicated on my build - here they are in situ: Although the Shackleton shared many common parts with the Lancaster inboard nacelles (more on that shortly) the Shackleton nacelle was much longer and had a streamlined fairing which protruded from the trailing edge of the wing. This was carefully copied from the plans and glued to the wing: I was able to use the wheel-bay area of the ID Models Lancaster kit, and once the forward and rear bulkheads were made and added from plastic card, this gave a good starting point to start creating the rear section of the nacelle from plastic card formers: Both sets were made alongside each other and added simultaneously to ensure they are identical: The forward-most section immediately behind the firewall and and the rear sections will now be skinned with the planking method I've used before: ...so when that's done I'll update you again. Tom 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krow113 Posted August 5, 2016 Share Posted August 5, 2016 Excellent work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wingco57 Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 Indeed, never knew about that different shaped firewall, I also assumed they were circular. Cees Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gfiend Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 Hi Tom, Fantastic work - really inspirational. Paul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators JeroenPeters Posted August 7, 2016 Administrators Share Posted August 7, 2016 Can't wait to see this up close in Telford... (counting on you to bring it ) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThomasProbert Posted August 10, 2016 Author Share Posted August 10, 2016 Can't wait to see this up close in Telford... (counting on you to bring it ) Thanks for stopping by and your kind words. Yes Jeroen, I'll bring it along as a work in progress and there's no chance it'll be finished by then. A bit more progress to report... I've got the inboard engine nacelles and fairings completed this week, which began by once again using plastic card 'planks' to cover the frame of the nacelles built previously. This method is time consuming, but allows the complex curves of the shape to be replicated far more easily than using sheets of larger card, as bending this to shape and getting it to conform to the desired shape is more hassle than it's worth. It all looks a little rough and ready in this picture, and you can see how the donor Lancaster nacelle starts to taper a lot sooner than on the Shackleton as the Lancaster nacelle fairing is of course in line with the trailing edge - unlike the Shackleton. This mis-shape would be solved with filler: In this photo you can see how the extreme rear of the nacelle would be very difficult to get right with the plank method, so instead I sculpted this complex shape with Milliput, seen here after an initial sanding: After the usual P38 automotive filler treatment and a thorough session with the wet and dry paper, the nacelle took on the shape of the real thing and is now as smooth as a baby's bottom - you can see how the filler has built up the dip at the taper at the end of the Lancaster donor parts and planks, solving the shape problem: I'm really pleased with the results, and I think have captured the complex shape of the real aircraft reasonably well - or as well as I could hope for, anyway! You've probably noticed the nacelles haven't had their usual coating in filler-primer, and that's because I've run out... and I've also just run out of P38 too; that's a whole tin used on this project so far. A trip to Halfords, me thinks... ...but when you consider this project has cost me nothing more than the price of some plastic card sheets and £7.99 for a tub of P38, that's pretty good going! Until next time, Tom 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wingco57 Posted August 11, 2016 Share Posted August 11, 2016 Tom, I know you feel great after having pulled off this potentially problem stage but you passed with flying colours. It must be awkward handling the model while you were filling and sanding those nacelles. I noticed that the fuselage has that square bulk as the original and looks just great. What is the difference between that P38 filler you use and Milliput? I would have made that nacelle mostly from Milliput but the problem would be that the model would become too heavy. Hmm, perhaps I have answered my own queston already. For the Manchester I have to completely build the nacelles from scratch too so your tutorial is right on time. Keep it up, this is getting better and better with every update. Cees Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThomasProbert Posted August 11, 2016 Author Share Posted August 11, 2016 Tom,I know you feel great after having pulled off this potentially problem stage but you passed with flying colours.It must be awkward handling the model while you were filling and sanding those nacelles. I noticed that thefuselage has that square bulk as the original and looks just great. What is the difference between that P38 filler you use and Milliput? I would have made that nacelle mostly from Milliput but the problem would be that the model would become too heavy. Hmm, perhaps I have answered my own queston already. For the Manchester I have to completely build the nacellesfrom scratch too so your tutorial is right on time.Keep it up, this is getting better and better with every update.Cees Thanks for dropping in Cees, and for you kind words once again. Yes the size is an issue and handling it is not easy - the lamp has gone flying on numerous occasions! The difference between P38 and Milliput is primarily that the former is used in the automotive industry. It is in two-parts (the filler and hardener) and dries absolutely solid in about 15 mins with no shrinkage. It's very easy to sand and can be scribed without problems, too. The bonus is also the fact that it's very light but also very strong. Milliput, as you know, is easier to sculpt when wet but takes an age to dry and doesn't sand quite as well. Each has their own strength for different jobs I suppose. The P38 absolutely stinks though, so I'm banished to the garden if I want to use it. I'll look forward to seeing you tackle the nacelles on your Manchester when the time comes. Tom 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wingco57 Posted August 12, 2016 Share Posted August 12, 2016 Thanks, that will be probably sooner than later. Sanding the perspex wingtip lights at the moment. I agree that Milliput is heavy and slow drying, that P38 sounds good, might try that sometime. Cees Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators JeroenPeters Posted August 12, 2016 Administrators Share Posted August 12, 2016 Really loving this.. Makes it look as if sculpting is easier than 3D modeling on the 'puter.. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThomasProbert Posted August 16, 2016 Author Share Posted August 16, 2016 This week I've spent some time finishing off the nose section of the big Shackleton. When the MR2 airframes were converted to AEW2s, the nose armament of cannons and sighting gear was removed, but the turret fairing itself remained with the gun apertures blanked over - see here on this image of an AEW2: To replicate this, I first cut a piece of plastic card to the correct width of the nose, and heated it some hot water around a section of dowel to get the correct curvature. This was then glued to the nose and allowed to dry thoroughly: Next, more plastic card faired in the sides, but you can see the sides don't match the contours of the fuselage yet: These aerodynamic fairings were sculpted from Milliput and then finally blended with P38 and the whole area sanded smooth: A bit of paneling and the covers for the guns were made from thin Evergreen strip and plastic card: And hey presto - the nose was done! The camera angle and my poor photography skills makes everything look a bit elongated, but you get the idea! Until next time, Tom 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArnieC Posted August 16, 2016 Share Posted August 16, 2016 WOW!!!!!! Just one word WOW!!!!! :notworthy: Cheers, Arnold Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThomasProbert Posted August 16, 2016 Author Share Posted August 16, 2016 WOW!!!!!! Just one word WOW!!!!! :notworthy: Cheers, Arnold Many thanks, Arnold. Just thought this was worth sharing - here's the design for the tail wheels that a friend is 3D printing for me. This man has some serious talent! Saves on some serious scratch-building time Tom 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wingco57 Posted August 17, 2016 Share Posted August 17, 2016 Love your nosejob Tom. Cees 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators JeroenPeters Posted August 17, 2016 Administrators Share Posted August 17, 2016 Love your nosejob Tom. Cees Ditto! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now