Jump to content

Clunkmeister

Administrators
  • Posts

    7,162
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Clunkmeister

  1. Check for internal clearances. So far, it all looks really nice. Tonight, we’ll use a bit of oil paint to give it all some grain.
  2. So far, very thing fits as it should. Which isn’t surprising as Lukgraph has been doing this for years.
  3. Let’s build, guys! (And gal)
  4. First we start with a basic cage. Pretty normal stuff for those who build WW1 kits.
  5. Chris, Lukgraph is an outgrowth of Silver Wings, a company we’re all familiar with. Silver Wings went into WW2 stuff, and one of their guys wanted to stay with biplanes, so he started Lukgraph. They have a VERY cool website and, like Silver Wings, are a Polish company. Check it out and check out the esoteric aircraft they give us in 1/32 and 1/48. Here is Lukgraph’s website…. https://lukgraph.pl
  6. Me and my big mouth. 🤣😂🤣😂
  7. Matt posted a reply on LSP. There are two sides to every story and it’s good to hear the other side. Sheds some light on it all. OK folks, let’s wrap this up. We’re beating a dead horse here.
  8. Martin, I found out this: if you look on the pictures, you’ll see a white insulated poking through the left fuselage side below the greenhouse, beside the radio stack. That’s the antenna lead to the overhead dipole antenna. The lead comes down from the strung antenna and goes through the insulator into the radios. It took seeing it on a model build to finally get it.
  9. Good to see you, Vince! Feel free to jump right in. We have a GB that just started where we made it so open ended that almost everything shout of a Panzer lV will qualify.
  10. That’s one difference about this place. I encourage respectful criticism, especially from those I know and love, because I’m not too proud to say that I sometimes make decisions not based in fact, or miss something I could or should have handled. Respectful criticism has its place, at least for me. Nothing may come of it, of course, but I won’t blow you up over honest correction. I base my decisions on personal experience and what I see as (un)common sense, but even those almost perfect people like me still screw up once or twice every decade.
  11. Well said. I’ve deleted people here at their request, and I guess it acts different than theirs. In the end, Maru is here and I’m thrilled
  12. Hey guys, one thing I’ll add here, FYI. Regarding the actual forum hosting sites and software. This is something I didn’t realize until I actually became an Admin and had to follow through on a request from a member to delete his account. When a member requests you delete their account, their previous posts will then show him as a “guest”, and, I hate to say, will, at least in the short term, show him as “Banned”. It’s just a fact. Here at least, that’s how the software does it, so it’s not a vindictive or vengeful act on the part of the Admin. There is also a “Ban Member” spot as well, but either way still shows as “banned”. Yep it sux, but that’s the software. If there’s a different way, well, I don’t know about it. I THINK LSP uses similar software to ours, just with different preferences, settings, and such. Plus, if the member has been a member for an extended period, the deleted member’s previous posts will still show up, as they are out there in the ether. Removing multiple thousands of that person’s previous posts is one serious major PITA and all but impossible to do because every single post has to be deleted individually, one at a time. That means some poor schmuk has to go back, page by page through multiple forums and threads, piece by piece, tracking down multiple thousands of posts, much of it in archived areas. Plus, I’m not sure about all software, but they might even reappear later because nothing is ever really “gone” from the web. So no, I don’t think the final action of the Admin was meant to be hurtful whatsoever. If you request your account be deleted, it’ll show, (at least in the short term) “banned”. I don’t however understand the IP block. As far as I know, that is a separate action all on it’s own. Unless they have it built in to their “actions” somehow. That leaves me scratching my head.
  13. Goes to show you that the old kits still have lots of life left in them. Awesome work, sir!
  14. Beautiful job! It’s good to see the 48 kit goes together as well as the 32 kit.
  15. Truly brilliant! This is another of my “someday gotta do’s”. Fabulous work!
  16. Probably your best Corsair yet, John. Nice!
  17. Spot on, my friend! I’m very much looking forward to getting a peek at mine after the good lads at Hannants send it to me. It looks to be a pretty darn accurate Hurricane, as well!
  18. Can’t leave well enough alone, I’m fixing the hard demarcation on the rear fuselage, and the prop. Some brake lines just got added, and aa bit of grease/grunge on the wheels. Trying to find aa good diagram of the wireless antenna. This isn’t exactly a 109 that has been studied to death…
  19. Yea that’s my plan. I’m setting it aside to finish the flaps and work on my GB entry, then I’ll go at it again in a couple weeks
  20. Yes Martin I shall. Plus fixing the hard line between the white and blue on the rear. and dull the prop and spinner. I just need a break. LOL
  21. This is more up my alley, so we’ll proceed with happiness and grace 😁
  22. Thanks, it was very dark where I snapped those last two pics, but once it clears up outside, we’ll see about pics in the sunlight. I apparently need to take the sheen off the prop and spinner (oops), but we’ll do that today. And a hard cami line on the rear fuselage I absolutely missed. Easy and quick fixes, but still more to do. It certainly looks a bit flat and dead in the dark. Tonight after I find time, I’ll get some good pics posted
  23. Sasha, I just found this build, and ooooh boy, what a great start! A truly unique and classic 1950’s fighter!
×
×
  • Create New...