FME erk

142 Squadron was trained to deliver Gas. They had a facility at RAF Grimsby and they stored the canisters in a Robin hangar over the far side of the airfield. Air14/2738 states: " 5th May 1942 a hangarette be erected at Grimsby for the purpose of storing SCI's (Service Chemical Installation) the name given to bombs containing gas ". It goes on to say . . . "The covering is Uralite, which would shatter in a blast but the building would not collapse". Strangely I have never seen a photo of a squadron Wellington with a gas circle but after they transferred out in November 1942 the Lancasters didnt have the gas patch on their nose until October 1943 at the earliest that I am aware .

Kai If you trawl the first page you will see the actual aircraft I am going to model and you can see the gas patch circle on her nose. The yellow circle on the head rest of the pilots seat, also seen on the armour head rest of the Mosquito navigator, is to indicate that its armour and could affect the aircrafts compass and not for the same purpose as the yellow circle on the nose . . . Thanks for the compliment , always appreciated Ian

Thank you Hubert, It will be a worlds first I believe . . . Ian

Sorry Phil The Gas detection circle was to detect gas in the air or even when the aircraft was at dispersal . . . .

While waiting for Mr. Surfacer to dry through I cracked on with a few other small jobs . . . Decided to put down a riveted floor . . . ND644 carried a No.1 Group gas circle on her nose so . . . and finally I modified the pilots seat . . . its time to go out so more next week Ian

Really pleased for you . . . I trust there is a full article inside giving the details of the build . . .

So after a couple o nights work we have this . . . Window blanks fitted and covered with Mr. Surfacer More to come . . . Ian

Well it served on American airfields here in England but not with the RAF (not that that will stop people ) but I think its a nice inclusion for a scene . . . https://www.airfix.com/uk-en/shop/new-for-2021/austin-k2-y-ambulance.html I may be tempted to get one if only to convert to a 30cwt lorry dont tell anybody Ian

Thats dedication for you . . . . when a man wants to put on 400 decals, 400 ? Black gloss can be a killer but you got it licked . . . Turned out really well great effort Kai Ian

Phil I believe the repair depot you mentioned was at Bracebridge Heath, still a couple of the big Belfast truss hangars there in use by a Lincoln haulage company. The windows were taken out on the production line around November 1943 . . . Ian

So, last night I started a major part of the spec for my particular aircraft. All the fuselage windows barring the W/op's needs to be eliminated. I dare say most modellers would put in the kit windows provided and smooth over with some filler ? I prefer to put in pieces of plasti-card and to that end I started to square off the windows to make it that bit easier to put pieces in. 2nd photo shows some measurements . . . That will keep be busy for a couple of nights . . ZZZ zz Ian

Good evening Chaps Another modification that is required is the lowering of the pilots platform. Apart from his seat being to high compared to the window of the cockpit, its also the wrong size so that too will require some modifications. The pilots platform was cut off flat to the cockpit floor and the hole filled with plasti-card. I also cut off the battery pack near to the W/op's seat as I intend to put down a riveted floor, just to make it look better . . . bye for now Ian

Unbelievable work so far Ron . . . . and all from scratch

. . . and thats why we do it Kai I want to spend the time making the alterations cos for me, it will be the ultimate Lancaster kit. I too have spent £'s on after market stuff and if you include the cost of the vehicles to display with the aircraft when it finished . . . Some of the alterations probably are not required cos most members of the public that view it wouldn't appreciate the alterations. I not saying they wouldn't appreciate the size and look of the aircraft cos it is an eye catcher but Us modellers know that some kit dont 'fall together' and only we truly appreciate the workings that go into turning a pigs ear into a silk purse . . . Ian

There are so many small jobs that are required to be done in order to obtain the very best out of the kit. The front turret is quite prominent and one can see into it so to that end, the five Sink marks needed to be filled. I made up a pot of Sprue glue made up of the HK tags removed from the fuselage . . . Another error that I have discovered are the side engine cowlings have a square panel on them. I haven't seen this on any wartime aircraft photos and it isnt clear on postwar aircraft either so I'm not sure where they have come from. Again Sprue glue has been put to use . . . I'll keep looking in the box for some more of the smaller jobs to add to the list

Just a note to say that I have removed the ejector pin marks off the bomb and the undercarriage doors, all 38 of them Also removed the Flare chute exit molding on the starboard side just behind the bomb bay Going to give it a few more days before I start rubbing down Mr. Surfacer off the wings . . . Ian

I'll watch out for that. I must admit the front of the cockpit canopy does look a bit 'pointy' . . .

Carl there are no inner doors and I dont want to run to the expense of a massive PE set that covers the whole of the bomb bay and doors . . . thanks for asking Ian

Kia I did see that when you posted it, I couldnt tell from the above photo if I had seen it. I think its a splendid build and there is much to be admired . . . Quick question: What did you use to glue the cockpit blister onto the canopy ?? Ian

Kia that actual photo is what I have as reference . . . Perhaps I mis-read what you said, as we were talking about early aircraft having the trailing outlet on the starboard side and i thought you were thinking "In the ED-Series at least the 464-Provisionings also had that feature." Anyhow, I'm glad we cleared that up . . . Ian PS Would like to see a photo of your Lancaster build . . ..

Kia I dont think they did so I would be interested in seeing the photo that shows that in position . . . Gibson aircraft certainly had the trailing aerial on the Port side You are right though about finding as many pics as possible of the aircraft you want to model . . . Ian

Kai I do believe it was only on those aircraft with the serial no. starting with the letter 'R' and 'W'. You are right when you say its on the DV range but to which aircraft it changed will probably be never known . . . Ian

Sorry Harv wrong format . . . .# Should be able to see it now

Another item on the 'To Do ' list . . . the removal of 22 ejector pin marks within the bomb bay doors . . . They are a good 12 inches long . . . plenty of space in there Probably get away with using a sanding stick Ian

So, I have had look at the external parts of the kit and TWO obvious errors. There is a second dinghy stowage hatch in the PORT wing and also on the starboard wing, underneath so not so obvious, there is a Second set of landing lights. To eliminate these I have masked and applied some 'Mr. Surfacer'. These will be left for a couple days to cure . . . One other item to be eliminated is the trailing aerial outlet on the starboard side just near to the bomb-bay. I have known about this for some time and none of my previous Lancaster builds carry this . . . Looked also into the bomb bay racks, they are covered with ejector pins marks. I intend to have the bomb doors open so its inevitable that they will need to be removed, SOME have been highlighted . . . I'm back to work tomorrow so more progress reports as I get these things done . . . Ian