Jump to content

Spitfire

Members
  • Posts

    881
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Spitfire

  1. Amazing work, way beyond me nowadays but its great to watch your progress. Cheers Dennis
  2. For a future build of a Hobbycraft P51A, from Aerocraft Models, spinner and blades. Cheers Dennis
  3. Thank you guys, slowly, slowly, is the way forward. Cheers Dennis
  4. Nice one John the 109F is probably (in my view) the best looking 109 there was and looks really well in desert finish, that well in fact that I have one in the stash. Cheers Dennis
  5. Thank you for that Peter, it is more tempting to do too much with the right hand than it was with the left, but my ever vigilant better half very quickly shuts me down if I get too adventurous. Cheers Dennis
  6. Well the left hand is healing nicely and the right is coming along well so some bench time was due. I'm still working on the PCM Macchi C200, the airframe is all together, the one job that was worrying me was getting the engine and cowling to mate up to the fuselage so I set about it. First up was getting the positioning of the engine and the cowling right, this required spacers on the nose of the fuselage and also some "stops" inside the cowling to ensure that the engine did not protrude too far out of the cowling. Then the bridge between the fuselage and cowling needed to be fettled to make it fit. All this required some head scratching which was putting me off working on it but eventually I got there. Nose spacers Engine stops And the engine fitted And the result, a tad blurred but it looks about right, nothing is glued yet as I want to get the cowling (Yellow) and airframe (camo) painted first. Cheers Dennis
  7. Guilty as charged I also have boxes of left over parts and parts from scrapped models, I do dip into them from time to time as well, they do come in handy. Cheers Dennis
  8. Now that looks really good. Cheers Dennis
  9. I have 2 of these in the stash so it will be interesting to follow this build, lead on. Cheers Dennis
  10. Thats pretty shocking to see such a historic aircraft rotting away, what a shame. Cheers Dennis
  11. Neat piece of problem solving, proper modelling. Cheers Dennis
  12. I am not a great fan of "modern" subjects but the Hustler is such an amazing looking aircraft that it does capture my imagination, and I have always like that camouflage scheme, great work, can't wait to see the finished result. Cheers Dennis
  13. Nice one Peter, that looks great. Cheers Dennis
  14. Absolutely bonkers, but also a magnificent build, what an awesome sight the real thing must have been looking at the WW2 photos. The RAF's first heavy, such a significant subject, for us mortals a 1/48 scale kit would do. Cheers Dennis
  15. No problem, it's nice to share the knowledge that Edgar gathered over the years. Cheers Dennis
  16. The 1 man army masks have been rated highly by people who have used them especially the smaller stencil masks, I have a set for a future Revell Hurricane build. Cheers Dennis
  17. No problem Peter, there is a PDF which contains a lot of Edgar's not just about Spitfires as well. https://jonbius.com/edgar-brooks-spitfire-notes/ Cheers Dennis
  18. Spitfire walkway lines never go over the national markings, here's a thread from Britmodeller with words of wisdom from the late Spitfire expert Edgar. https://www.britmodeller.com/forums/index.php?/topic/234920715-spitfire-wing-walk-markings/ Official instructions were that nothing should encroach onto the roundels. Remember that the line ran along the line of the mainspar, so you're probably seeing that panel line showing through, not the paint. Edgar Potato Pete, on Jun 20 2012, 07:37 PM, said: - do you know if the layout for the wing walk markings changed over time? I've just been comparing the Airfix Spit Mk 1 pattern with the Tamiya Mk IX and they're quite different. Or is that just poor research on their part? I can imagine them varying after repaints in the field. On early aircraft, the emphasis was on keeping the erks' boots (rubber-soled, by the way) off the area of the radiator, since a dished top surface, in that area, meant a replacement wing. This meant that the port wing lines ran like a backward "Z" up alongside the cockpit, then left along the mainspar, then right out to the leading edge at the wingtip joint. The starboard wing's line went straight from wingroot out to wingtip. When the set-up went to two radiators, the wings' top surfaces were strengthened, so that erks could walk either side of the cockpit, but still had to keep off the radiators' area. You then had two sets of lines which were identical, but mirror images of each other, i.e. the original backward Z to port and Z to starboard. Hope this helps Cheers Dennis
  19. Great work, neat and tidy, and so fast, I have been on holiday and only just spotted this build. I never build kits with opened panels, as I do like to see the smooth lines of the actual aircraft so I am with you on that one, though I might surprise myself one day building one with panels off just for fun. Cheers Dennis
  20. Some fantastic models there, the time taken building them must be into many years, the USS Hornet was particularly fascinating for me. Cheers Dennis
  21. All the best, enjoy Cheers Dennis
  22. You can't beat a cat cobuilder. Cheers Dennis
  23. Now that's a fine collection. Cheers Dennis
  24. Nice one John, my last P40 was the ancient Revell one, but I do have one of Hasegawa's version in the stash, one day I'll get round to it. Cheers Dennis
×
×
  • Create New...