Jump to content

Clunkmeister

Administrators
  • Posts

    7,142
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Clunkmeister

  1. If there was a facepalm emoji.... but yes, I mean models. Oh wait, I’ll use this one.
  2. Welcome to LSM, Ryan. Some nice work there and I’m looking forward to seeing more.
  3. I just had to put this here. A picture of probably the best looking Lanc ever to fly. Oh boy I love this scheme.
  4. One thing I'd like to do in 2019 is to actually try building an AFV. I say that every year, but it never, ever happens.
  5. Smitty, I’m positive that Mk.81s are in he other box, so positive in fact that I’m gonna look and if there, I’ll send them to you.
  6. Oooooh, amazingly awesome! I’m a between the wars guy, and I love the Gladiator. I DO hope ICM completes the triumvirate and gets us the I.15 as well, though. Times are indeed good as a Large Scale Modeller.
  7. We’re open. Thurs or Friday, anything’s good by me.
  8. What a tragedy that was. Today still, the thought of the bureaucratic bungling makes me sick to my stomach. I expect there were sailors that could have lived if the Soviets had allowed the world to help.
  9. just messing with you, my friend. No cork and wire fuel gauge for you. But it’s actually much, much easier to handle from the rear. Much easier to feel the swing starting before you even see it.
  10. Doesn’t one of the ZM weapons sets have Mk.81s?
  11. SO much like fun. And it’s a unique feature of this big ugly thing, so they gotta be at least partially open.
  12. There’s nothing simple about the flaps/dive brakes. If you backdate the kit to a -3 or a -1C, you get solid flaps/dive brakes. Late production -3s got the perforated flaps with serrated trailing edges. So if you wanna do a -4 like me, you better like PE.
  13. Yup, so it seems. I’d like the lower flaps open, but it all depends.
  14. Yeah I went to respond and I did something wrong. :-/
  15. OK, I went to respond to Nigel and instead screwed up his post by vanishing it into thin air. Yes, it seems like Nigel's post asking about accuracy is gone. If you see a post missing, it's MY fault. You may now laugh uproariously and point mockingly at this silly man.
  16. You gotta love those panel designs. Instruments placed totally haphazard, if there's space for an instrument, stick one there! The B-24 seems better than most, though. At least the basic flight instruments are (more or less) directly in front of the pilot.
  17. Cool thread. Of course I'll be contrary and might eventually come to the party with my Craftworks kit. Gotta love old,. old, old, OLD school resin.
  18. We will supply a full build review with pics etc, as soon as it's done. I wasn't sure going into this that this wouldn't end up being another abandoned HPH build. we all know how some silly unexpected mistake turns into a major issue on these things, or it gets knocked moff the bench and shatters into 3 million pieces, or whatever. It can and does happen, and I don't want to jinx it now. So give me time, and I hope within a month or two I'll have you a full build review.
  19. VERY nice. Canadian Leo 2 without all the Afghanistan add-ons. It's nice to see the basic vehicle itself for a change.
  20. I'm still wondering why he's flying from the wrong seat. Everyone knows real Cub-O-holics fly from the rear seat.
×
×
  • Create New...