Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Administrators
Posted
6 hours ago, Sir Desmond Glazebrook said:

This thread is facetious. Have fun.

Look at this fetching beast!

oJqEab.jpg

Not often have the Germans come up with a whopper, but that one burns my eyes. 
 

I’ll never be able to unsee it. 

  • Like 1
  • Administrators
Posted
2 hours ago, IainMackayDall said:

Was it not nicknamed the flying T*t by those transported or having to fly it..

Like there should be a nipple ring hanging from the front.

But I sure respect the Argosy. A real hauler

  • Like 2
Posted

How about these, Boeing has excelled here with the nose. The Farman Jabiru has both looks and name to match. But back to Boeing.
I still maintain if they had given the X-32 a more aggressive look, they could have won theat contract

maxresdefault.jpg

Farman_F.4X_F-AHAF_CIDNA_Dübendorf_-_LBS_SR02-10182_(rotate,_tight_crop,_contrast).jpg

Boeing-X-32.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted
18 hours ago, Clunkmeister said:

Sorry, Hubert, but it isn’t always the British, my friend.

 

AE1BE1EC-E3DF-4A47-B4E1-06AD2BA4B20D.jpegThe « Deux-ponts » is still a beauty, compared to the steeds from the Blackburn stable .... The last one is called the Blackburd. Methink there is one « b » too many, that should have been replaced by a « t » ;)

Hubert

 

27AD9A39-C57F-44B9-97DC-0FE43FB99BBD.jpeg

CD722D89-7028-4C6E-BC14-2632FB35F5D0.jpeg

  • Like 3
Posted
17 hours ago, Clunkmeister said:

And I never really understood the idea behind this abomination

 

D3658878-8EEE-42BF-A9DC-42294F86A8CE.jpeg

What the hell is it? Looks like someone nailed pieces onto their garden shed!

  • Like 3
  • Administrators
Posted
2 hours ago, GusMac said:

What the hell is it? Looks like someone nailed pieces onto their garden shed!

:lol:   :rofl:

Well, ZK is New Zealand. So they're the guilty party here.

  • Like 2
  • Administrators
Posted
23 hours ago, IainMackayDall said:

How about these, Boeing has excelled here with the nose. The Farman Jabiru has both looks and name to match. But back to Boeing.
I still maintain if they had given the X-32 a more aggressive look, they could have won theat contract

maxresdefault.jpg

Farman_F.4X_F-AHAF_CIDNA_Dübendorf_-_LBS_SR02-10182_(rotate,_tight_crop,_contrast).jpg

Boeing-X-32.jpg

Well, where do we start?

That Boeing looks like it needs outriggers for that schnoz.

The center engine on the Farman is blanked by.......... the entire aircraft. I expect it's sole purose in life was to disturb the airflow just enough to allow the outrigger props to lose 80% of their efficiency. That and to ensure the interior was a noisy as possible.

And the X-32, what can be said other that it got the last laugh. It'll live in cartoon drawings for all eternity.

  • Like 3
  • Administrators
Posted
6 hours ago, Sir Desmond Glazebrook said:

When I lived with Ben Buckley in the early 70's, he had recently lost an Air Truck in a crash. It is a crop duster.

It must have been “fun” to land gracefully....

  • Like 2
Posted
On 12/2/2019 at 5:56 AM, IainMackayDall said:

How about these, Boeing has excelled here with the nose. The Farman Jabiru has both looks and name to match. But back to Boeing.
I still maintain if they had given the X-32 a more aggressive look, they could have won theat contract

maxresdefault.jpg

 

 

This presumably is the Boeing Durante in honour of ole schnozzola himself?!

  • Like 3
Posted
On 12/3/2019 at 12:48 PM, GusMac said:

This presumably is the Boeing Durante in honour of ole schnozzola himself?!

That's what I was going to say!

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...