Jump to content
The Great LSM Twins Group Build ends July 3, 2024 ×

Planet Models Yak-23


Recommended Posts

she's on her legs (yet to be painted), this is not my best build but I'm doing something new and learning lots of new things after 5 decades of modelling !  I have been shocked at how heavy it is, I thought I overdid the nose weight by a country mile however it's just at that tipping point, if a bee landed on it's tail it will tail sit !

IMG_6105 Medium.jpeg

IMG_6106 Medium.jpeg

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of my pet obsessions is to give models a proper weight sensation, that reflects the bulk of the original. I try, as much as I can, to have the model weight scale-proportional to the original. For instance, a 1/200 Titanic model should weigh 52 300 x 10^3 kgs / 200^3 = 6.5 kgs. (That’s 52 300 tonnes x 1000 - to get the weight in kgs- divided by 200 to the cube, as the density - weight/volume - is constant, whichever the size of the object).

In you case, the Yak should weigh between 60 (empty) and 103 grs (full load).

And yet another variable introduced in modelling 😂 !

Hubert

  • Like 1
  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Peterpools said:

Hubert

Some mighty incredible math.

 

Thanks for the compliment, but it’s pretty basic arithmetics, once you grasp the concepts of volume relationship between the original and the kit, and of volumetric density.

Hubert

PS: to explain these concepts, let’s take a cube of 1x1x1 meter. Its volume is 1 cubic meter. If you fill it with water, you’ll get 1 cubic meter of water, or 1000 liters, and the water weight will be 1 metric tonne, or 1000 kilograms, as one liter of water weighs 1 kilogram. Water has a volumetric density of one, table oil of about 0.9, concrete of about 2.4, iron of 7.85.

Now, let’s design a 1/10 scale model of the said cube. It will be 10cmx10cmx10cm. its volume will thus be 10^3 (or 10x10x10) cubic centimeters. As water has a volumetric density of 1, 1 cubic centimeter of water weighs 1 gram, and our model filled with water will weigh 1000 grams, or 1 kilogram. The 1/10 scale cube of water weighs 1000 times less (or 1/10^3) than the original cube of 1 meter x 1 meter x 1 meter. QED (and end of thread drift)

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hubert

Thank you for the explanation and example. One of the areas I was responsible for in the building of custom gunite swimming pools was the water hydraulics for water features such as negative edges, cascades, spas and fountains and everything in between. In a way pretty much the same as to insure all the water features worked flawlessly, it all started with having the right amount of water when needed and the ability to flow at specific rates.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi all,

I made a really novice error right at the end of the build so the kit sits 100% built but 99% finished.  I got the painting sorted out, decals on, final coat of future before really light weathering, mainly panel lines darkened using a flory wash. Went to wipe the excess off once dried and it wouldn't come off. I think, because of the cold in the room I model in, that the future wasn't fully dried and the flory wash merged in with the future. It looks awful, so now sits at the back of a shelf. Resin experiment over, I'm back to IM kits at present. I would build another one if the subject was right for me, I learnt a few things along the way but I guess I'm a creature of habit, I like working with IM, I know what I'm doing and I know what to avoid where I have skill weaknesses. Anyway, some pictures pre and post my error......... 

IMG_6118.JPG

IMG_6121 Large.jpeg

IMG_6124 Large.jpeg

IMG_6125 Large.jpeg

IMG_6126 Large.jpeg

IMG_6127 Large.jpeg

IMG_6128 Large.jpeg

IMG_6129 Large.jpeg

  • Like 4
  • Sad 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yikes, that terrible. Any chance of a light sanding will remove the stains? With all the work done so perfectly, I would strip her back to bare plastic and start the painting procedure over - just way to much good work to sit at the back of the shelf. 

I've stripped more models then I care to remember.

 

 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, like Karl suggested, Future will disappear with an ammonia-based cleaner...

And, by-the-way, the effect of the washes was not bad everywhere. It produced an interesting effect on the fuselage and wings, but, I agree, looks bad on the elevators.

Hubert

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a little late, entering the party, but really like your work with the Yak. These quirky looking early jets have their charms. Besides the wash accident, everything came together very nice and I'm with Hubert. You spent too much fine work to not have a try at cleaning the mess off.

Cheers Rob

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, npb748r said:

I'll give that a go, haven't seen or used ajax for years so even if it's just for nostalgia purposes it's worth a try - thanks.

I think it's Windolene in the UK.  Ajax here was a powder abrasive cleaner from memory.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, GusMac said:

I think it's Windolene in the UK.  Ajax here was a powder abrasive cleaner from memory.

I was thinking Ajax as the powder cleaner. Will try Windolene, I suspect Ajax will do the job but less subtly 😁  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, npb748r said:

I was thinking Ajax as the powder cleaner. Will try Windolene, I suspect Ajax will do the job but less subtly 😁  

Ammonia based glass cleaner!  Please don;t use anything abrasive.  Great looking build.  I used those kinds of washes once...   never again.  Oil paint is more controllable.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes Flory washes ......we've all tried them ...when they are nice they can be very nice ...and when the go wrong they kill NMF and decals very quickly😀

I like dirty birds so have passed off the hit and miss results as heavy petting weathering . 

Good that you persevered though.....unless I really CBA ... I like trying something new as often as I can . I thinks it's all part of the hobby , even failures teach something . 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...