Jump to content

JeroenPeters

Administrators
  • Posts

    4,669
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JeroenPeters

  1. Cheers guys! Now... back to the Spiteful. Almost ready to close the pit. Oxygen hose to add. Side wall and console details to paint. Aded HGW harnesses and changed the lock to a later style Sutton.
  2. Hi All! Today I received the first 2 printed Tripod Jacks from Shapeways, modelled by Ronnie Olsthoorn. The detail is amazing and the accuracy the closest you can get. I had to adjust a few parts in order to prevent them from getting too fragile. Just a little bit of smoothing is needed with fine sandpaper on the legs. Even small details like the eye-lets on the fastening pins are there! Even the screw wire on the Ram is there... This jack is perfect for a 1/32 Mossie or other RAF subject. But looks great under a USAF subject too. If you want to order one yourself, visit the LSM Shapeways store! I will publish this and possibly other detailed models in co-operation with Ronnie Olsthoorn (Aviation artist) on Shapeways, so you can share in the joy. https://www.shapeways.com/shops/jeroenpeters
  3. Cool... Will this be part of a diorama??
  4. Ohhh that's sweet... so cool to touch up models. I can imagine it takes you back! Great job!!
  5. wow.... loving the layered radiators!
  6. Lovely/. In every respect.
  7. Just ordered two Jacks from Shapeways. Fingers crossed!! There's some delicate detail in there I might have to cut off and replace. We'll see...
  8. The jack (without the ram) is 5,8 cm high. I placed the jack on a 3d printing rig and placed the ram separately next to it. The prize to print one of these is 19,5 euro's. I'll do a test in Ultra frosted detail material. Fingers crossed!
  9. So Ronnie Olsthoorn replied on Facebook, saying he recently drew a 3D jack. Let's see if we can have this 3D printed!
  10. Cheers guys! Really trying to speed this build along. Did the instrument panel: Putting the wings together. Small gap at the rear of the insert, but thats an easy fix: Putting the prop together. Blades need a bit more smooth sanding: And I'm thinking of scratching two of these. Why? Because I want to build this plane with it's gear halfway retracted.
  11. Really cool and clean build. Great to see what can be achieved with these relatively basic Revell kits... Loving the FOD covers too.
  12. Damn sweet Maestro!!
  13. Still it seems to be correct. First the square plate and the rudder controls behind that:
  14. Not too much progress to show.. When detailing the rudder controls, I broke the part. Had to scratch it. Also had to scratch the handle on the seat, since that part was nowhere to be found.
  15. That's some in-between build! Nice work on the nav lights.
  16. And here we are! Today I was at Cees' place. He surprised me last week with the news that he was able to get his hands on parts /relics of the NN660 Spiteful prototype. Some RAF/aviation enthusiasts might know Tony Dyer. He has a nice collection of cockpits / parts of various RAF planes. In his collection is a Spiteful canopy and parts of the wreck site if the NN660. He was kind enough to Cees to send him some bits and Cees was kind enough to donate them to my next build. Since the NN660 was basically a modified Spit, I will build the NN664 prototype. What you see here is a piece of all skin, small part of the engine, a pice of rotol prop skin, instrument wiring and electrical wiring cover. Stay tuned!
  17. Hi Guys I bet you didn't expect me to tackle this subject... but I am! As you may know I always try to incorporate a piece of the original airplane to my builds. 'Fat chance!' I hear you say.... Stay tuned. A review done by Cees Broere and me of this Resin kit can be found here.
  18. I use CA and Future. Depends on how strong the bond needs to be.
  19. Just too cool! Right up my alley!!! Congrats Laurent, on subject, creativity and execution.
  20. 1:32 Sopwith F.1 Camel “Le Rhône” Wingnut Wings Kit No. 32071 Available from Wingnut Wings for $79,- Introduction Today we look at our fourth Sopwith Camel, being the Le Rhône engine version. Now you may think: big deal. It’s the Camel sprues with a Le Rhône engine thrown in for variation. Yes and no. But in order to really assess this is to take a look at our other reviews too: F.1 Camel ‘BR.1’ F1 Camel ‘Clerget’ 2F.1 ‘Ship’s Camel’ Stay tuned for the USAS Camel review on LSM soon. As I have done with the Ship’s Camel review, I will try to help you choose from 5 equally great Sopwith Camel kits. Why should I choose the Sopwith F.1 Camel “Le Rhône”? To the untrained eye the WW1 era rotary engines are pretty hard to discern. But when you look closely you start to spot a lot of obvious differences. Even between this Le Rhône 9J 110HP and it’s predecessor the Le Rhône 9C 80HP. The 9J has round copper intake manifold tubing on the back of the engine, whereas the 9C has square shaped manifolds which are seen from the front. This French origin little engine (100cm in diameter) was pretty interesting. It was built under license in Britain and Germany. The latter being named the Overursel UR.II. The 110HP addition to the name ofcourse indicates the amount of power it could whip up, but this engine was known to produce higher output depending on make, circumstances and ‘tuning’. Is this why you should choose this kit? Nah… I mean: the Clerget and Bentley engines had nominated output of 140HP and 150HP. The Le Rhône engine. Not the round shaped copper manifolds running to the back: One of the pro’s the Le Rhône engines had was the hydraulic Constantinesco interrupter gear for the guns, while the Clerget Camels had the less efficient Sopwith-Kauper No. 3 mechanical synchronizing gear. The hydraulic system was way more reliable and used impulses transmitted by a column of liquid to enable the gun trigger. Quite intricate for the day! This is all cool, but not visible on your model, so still no real good reason to choose this kit So let’s take a look at the schemes included in this kit (I usually do this at the end of my review). The Le Rhône Camels were used pretty late in the war, which means you can beat them up a little and you’ll find some colourful schemes. Scheme A gives you Camel B5417 ‘11’, flown by GAC Manley. “B” Flight 54 Squadron RFC, February 1918. This plane was forced to land behind enemy lines during an offensive patrol flight and photo’s were taken while it was on the ground. No cowling, stressed skin, broken tail skid. This could be a cool dio… Here it is on the ground. This is a different photo than shown in the booklet. Here the ailerons are still up and the fuselage looks less damaged: Scheme B shows Camel B5423 “6”, flown by FM Ohrt. “A” Flight 54 Squadron RFC, January 1918. Another Camel that was forced to land behind enemy lines while on offensive patrol after being hit by ground fire. The photo’s in the booklet show a pretty battered Camel. Chipped paint on the wheel covers. Even one cover missing (so you can replace it with a spoked wheel from Steven Robson). Both scheme A and B give you a chance to build a captured Camel that went through a rough landing. Scheme C is F.1 Camel C1555, dubbed “Suds”, flown by Francis L Luxmoore & Sydney P Gamon. 78(Home Defense) Squadron RFC, January-February 1918. Now here is a colourful scheme! It was equipped for night flying missions in the form of Holt lights and flares. The fuselage and wheel covers are thought to be light blue, but this however is not 100% certain. Still it would make for a nice change of all the green fabric! Scheme D shows F.1 Camel F2137 “U”, flown by Donald R MacLaren. “C” Flight 46 Squadron RAF, September-October 1918. We’ve got a real Ace on our hands here! The Canadian Donald Roderick MacLaren had 54 victories on his name. His last 9 victories were achieved in this particular plane. Red wheel covers, red pointy spinner and red/white stripes along the fuselage. When celebrating his last victory he broke his leg, after which he was sent back to the UK from the battlefields in France. After the war he assisted in setting up the Royal Canadian Air Force. He died at the age of 95 in 1988. You can find his medals today in the Canadian War Museum. So in short: if you’re from Canada… you HAVE to build this scheme! Take a look at MacLaren in wartime: And here later on in his life, after making a name in the Canadian Air Force and civilian aviation: Scheme E shows F.1 Camel F2141 “L”, flown by H Burdick. “B” Flight 17th Aero Squadron USAS, August – October 1918. This is a tricky one. This United States unit flew under the command of the RAF. Therefor you see RAF markings (like the white dumbbell on the fuselage). To make things more confusing this white dumbbell was also used by 45 Sqn in Italy at about the same time… Howard Burdick was born in Brooklyn, New York and had 8 victories to his name. Pretty cool detail: Howard’s son became a P-51 Ace in ww2. Howard died in 1975. Why you should build his plane? He was awarded the DSC (Distinguished Service Cross). Here’s why: The Distinguished Service Cross is presented to Howard Burdick, Second Lieutenant (Air Service), U.S. Army, for extraordinary heroism in action northwest of Cambrai, France, September 28, 1918. Attacked by two Fokker biplanes, Lieutenant Burdick outmaneuvered both machines, shot one into flames and routed the other one. Later, seeing three Fokkers attacking an American aviator, he at once dove into the combat to his assistance, shooting down one and driving off the other two. His quick and unhesitating attack, single-handed, on the three Fokkers save the life of his fellow pilot. And here's the man himself: Survivors As far as I could trace there is only one ‘air worthy’ Sopwith F.1 Camel with a Le Rhone engine left today. It changed hands a couple of times and is now for sale. It’s over 90 years old, has it’s original data plate and is overall original. If you want it, you can own it. For a mere 2.8 million dollars on the Vintage Aviation website: Link. All in all there are about 8 original Camels left in Museums worldwide, but many are restored and have many parts reproduction parts, new fabric and non original engines. Here's the B6291 as it was in 1993. Beautiful. The kit The kit itself is pretty comprehensible when you open the box. Five plastic sprues, some photo etch and decals. The A, B, C and D sprues are the same for the Clerget, Bentley and USAS kits. You can tell this by the four cowlings included on the A sprues and the separate engine sprue E. Sprue D shows a bit of warping in the sprue itself. The parts however are not affected. I have seen this on both my kits and read about it on some forums, but don’t sweat it: the parts are fine. The kit consists of: • 165 plastic parts • 17 plastic parts that make up the Le Rhone 9J 110HP engine • Optional cut down cockpit section (for scheme E), Holt Lights & Flares (for scheme C), Cooper bombs and optional small and large cut out top wing sections. • 10 photo etched parts • Cartograf decals Sprue A (containing cowlings, cockpit, wheels, struts...) Vickers guns: The middle cowling in this pic. That's the one you need... Sprue B. Wings parts, fuselage, instrument panel... Cockpit combing: Delicate fuselage surface detail: Inside fuselage. Ejector marks well out of way: Instrument panel with nice depth and detail: Lower wing detail. Not the control pulley and stitching detail: Upper wing with small cut out. A version with large cut out opening is included as well. C Sprue (transparencies): D Sprue (with wings, tail, rudder, prop, etc..) This is the only prop you'll need for this kit: Control stick and rudder controls: Looks at the delicate fabric over the ribs. Not overdone. just right: Sprue E. The Le Rhone 9J engine! Only 17 parts but a gem once assembled: Manifolds and push rods: Photo etch parts: Cartograf decals. Thin. 100% Registered. Great colours and detail. As always. Verdict Yes. This is the perfect kit of a great plane. Nothing more you can wish for. 5 late war schemes of the Le Rhone powered version. Really well researched as we have come to expect from Wingnut Wings. Superbly detailed and complete. The little Le Rhone engine is crisp and delicate. Really nothing more you could wish for… VERY highly recommended. My sincere thanks to Wingnut Wings for this review sample. Jeroen Peters
  21. The size and part count make me dizzy. But I will get the V2 without the truck & trailer. Lovely review of an obviously lovely kit..
  22. Sweet! And not just because it's Dutch.. The 3W I is the Tamiya kit righT?
×
×
  • Create New...