HubertB

Agreed ! Hubert

+1 ! Beautiful rendering, and in 1/72 furthermore ! Hubert

Lovely work, Rob Hubert

The link Martin provided explains it all in detail. To simplify it in layman’s terms you have three types of ropes on each gun carriage, two which are taut when the gun is stowed, and one loose, the breech rope, which retains the cannon recoiling from being fired, hence its large diameter. The taut line at the rear of the carriage, which you have shown, is to haul the gun back to load it with powder and cannonball. Then you have two side lines, taut as well, to haul back the carriage against the gunwale. The tension is balanced with the rear line, thus holding the cannon in place when the ship is rolling. In short, you can simplify the appearance, but cannot make the economy of the side rigging hauling the carriage towards the gunwale Hubert

Thank you Peter. I have to say I have not enjoyed myself so much during modelling for at least 5 decades Hubert

Time for a much needed update... As a general comment, I can understand John's (Mister G) comment about being overwhelmed by the number of tiny parts. The kit IS finicky, with plenty of small parts. The issue is not so much the number and size of parts, as the limitations of the molding process, where you end up for each part with a lot of sprue gates, which require careful, time-consuming, cleaning of the remaining "pips", and where it is especially complex when a squarish sprue gate meets a rounded section part. Another comment is that you must forget about any macho temptation to do away with instructions ... Read them once, twice, thrice, and then again a fourth time ... Although many parts seem identical and symmetrical along the X and Y axis, a significant number are in fact handed, with a notch, or pip, or recess molding here or there. If you do not pay attention, I can safely bet that you will get at least a few parts reversed . Ask me how I can be sure of having a winning bet 😁 ! This said, and knowing a bit about this field, I am VERY impressed with the mold cutting, the engineering, the quality of the design, and with such a complex kit, the overall fit. Well, at least so far...as I have read some reviews complaining about the fit. My only gripe is that, whilst understandable, the choice of symmetrical parts to minimise the number of original sprues can sometimes create issues. I hit such an issue with the main floor parts. Rather than mold the floor as one part, Miniarthave molded two halves, that abutt in the middle, with a very thin contact line. In my previous post, I said I had chosen to glue these two parts together early, in order to fill and sand any gaps. But, sure enough, my two halves soon decided that, if not going for an outright divorce, separate bedrooms were of the order of the day This called for a radical solution to ensure a better match. I scraped the middle floor "planks" with a chisel : ...and then glued some 20x40 thou strips, that would cover the whole middle section of the floor : Now I had a much larger gluing surface, and I could be sure that my two floor halves would stay together ! Time to start "dressing up"the bottoms of the car As designed, the central beams under the entry / driver's platform do not touch it along their whole length. Not very sensible form a mechanical point of view, IMHO The issue comes from the the two notches in the transverse beam, that rest on the two angled beams on the outside. That's an easy correction: On the left, above my thumb, the larger and deeper notch, on the right, the notch as designed by Miniart. When I said some parts were small and needed cleaning of the sprue gates, the inevitable consequence is that you can sometime struggle to hold the said parts. Typically, the small axis that is the shaft of the brake command decided to try a ballistic trajectory on its way to meeting the carpet monster 😂 ! But a small piece of rod was an easy replacement (the white vertical rod on the picture) ... Aaand fast forward to today, after a few hours of cleaning the parts separated from the sprues. I have finished stage 9 of the building, that deals with (a part of) the bottom of the car: You can see the puttying of the central seam and of the injection pin marks, dealt with courtesy of Tamiya putty ... I have also assembled the two benches of the main cabin, as you can see ... Adn seen from above, with the said benches loosely placed in situ. This shows the new central planking made with strips. Missing from my update are the pics of some passengers, which I have started assembling. I think I am now reaching the time to start spmasing some paint on this. TAFN Hubert

Given the … « munchy » … nature of one of the dogs, maybe a stainless steel cover, or better yet, some ERA, would be more appropriate ? Just my Hubert

She’s a real beauty, Peter. A timeless shape and design, still exciting to look at 50+ years after. Equalled only by the 917 Hubert

Another faster-than-light stunning build, John ! Hubert.

Very nice build on a not-too-easy kit (talk about an understatement ). If the B-58 looked like it was doing Mach 2 on the ground, the B-70 was doing warp 0.7 Hubert

Have you tried HPH’s epoxy resin ? Whilst slower setting than CA, it’s excellent on resin. Hubert

Thank you Peter. I should be able to post an update (smallish) in the next days. Hubert

Received two sets of upgrades for the J-29 F Tunnan rom Resin2detail. As designed, the kit's nose is wrong, being too short - by 1.5 mm - and with a too big intake in diameter (3 mm extra dia). Resin2detail have produced 3D-printed replcements for the nose, for the exhaust, as the kit's one is a bit heavy, and also a boarding ladder. Here are the pics, lifted from Resin2detail's site : As a side, but very important, comment, I'd like to have a big shout-out for Brian at Resin2detail. The first upgrade of the exhaust released turned out to be wrong : adequate for a -B version, but not for the -F which had an afterburner. This emerged from a discussion on LSP. Resin2detail made and printed the new, correct exhaust, that you see on this pic. And these are being sent for free to the customers like me who ordered the first, wrong, exhaust. Plus I got in my package a complimentary FOD cover and side intakes for the Tunnan ! Now that's what I call GREAT - wait, OUTSTANDING - customer service ! Hubert

Don’t know much about Red Fox, but they look nice on the pics on their site, with some interesting subjects. One point may answer your question anyway: it’s probably difficult to order directly from Quinta for the time being, given the sanctions enforced against Russia. So, it’s ordering from distributors’ stocks, and they must be dwindling since February 24th. Hubert

Talk about a weathered look. Had you wanted such a result, you’d have struggled to reproduce it … Hubert

I hope you have not glued the window yet, Rob, because the front one should be on the rear, port side, judging from the angle. Hubert

IMHO, it looks better with the rails, at least the one above the rudder post. Hubert

Actually, why put a stove in a vehicle that has electric power, and henceforth heating, available ? It looks like a (cool) mod to a static museum example. Hubert

Another vey neat build, done at an incredible speed furthermore 👍 ! Hubert

Another gem, achieved at warp speed 5.0 (which is a pretty neat speed for a WWI biplane ) Well done 👍 ! Hubert

Thanks for the pics, Martin. Was the stove a standard feature on these trams (well, I know, it was a Standard stove ) ? I was actually thinking of displaying the street section with a fine layer of snow ... Hubert

At least, that’s the plan, Rob Hubert

Hello all, After an hectic 15 weeks, I can now say I am settled in y new house, where the bench was rebuilt, and ready for some (old and new) projects. I wanted to contribute to this group build, whilst satisfying my pet idiosyncrasies : no camoed subject, civilian or at least peaceful subject, and possibly, not an aircraft, which would give me the excuse of an OOB build, which I am unable to do with wingy things. My choice has fallen on the Ukrainian manufacturer Miniart. I have been regularly impressed by their original subjects, and the impressive builds that could result with their kits, like for instance their Caterpillar dozer. I settled on their "European Tramcar kit". They have released other tramways kits, probably more appropriate for an Ukrainian city, i.e. the Russian-designed "X-type" tram. But, for this group build, I would not even want to choose of subject with a Russian or Soviet flavour. Still, their European tram, most likely a replica of a Gothaer Waggonfabrik tramcar, could very well have been used in Lviv, which used to be Polish until 1945. And, besides, I have decided I would not go for a specific Ukrainian town tramcar, but more for a fanciful" model, in Ukrainian colors, i.e. yellow bottom and blue top (which - I found in my browsings on the subject - is a color set used on some trams of the town of Gotha in Germany). Ok, on to the build ! The box is compact but filled to the brim with sprues ! I have not counted the parts, but read on the net that the base kit (without the passengers and crew) was made of 609 parts. We are in tank realm with this part count There is even a vacform base representing a portion of paved street with rails, at a tram stop, with a wrought iron bench and guard rails. The original vehicle being essentially symmetrical along the transverse middle axis, Miniart have chosen to model a lot of parts along one longitudinal half, which has saved a lot of tooling. This is why most of the sprues in the box are duplicated, or sometimes in present in 4 identical sets. I followed the instructions and started with the two sets of left and right entry steps. These are made of 5 parts, on of them the support for the forthcoming suspension springs. Then I decided to depart with the assembly instructions by assembling the two main floor halves. I feared that any joint cleaning would be very difficlut once all parts were added to them. I was right to fear a potential issue with the assembly of the two floor halves. There is some shrinkage in the middle, which creates a gap needing to be filled. Plus the bottom is smeared with multiple ejection pins marks. Even though this is underneath the tram, given that the bottoms are really very detailed, these marks need filling before going further. They have been filled, and I have resumed assembling some of the components of the bottom. However, this is currently stalled whilst the putty dries and awaits some sanding. So, to be continued another day Hubert

Watching him uttering his lies in front of the UN, I could not help but think how much the Russian ambassador to the UN looked like, almost to a caricature, to the « Russian ambassador » in the « The hunt for Red October » Hubert

Hang on ! I thought she was named « Duchess of Kingston », not « Philadelphia » ??? 🤪 Joking apart, phenomenal work on a beautiful kit, Rob. And Vallejo Gold duly bookmarked. Hubert