Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have to agree with Hubert on this one. After the Concorde, the Connie, and for it’s day, the 262. Without a doubt the B-58 has a place here too.

I’ll never forget my flight on Concorde in 1986. Pure magic.

Cheers, Wolf

  • Like 3
Posted
  On 12/25/2019 at 11:55 PM, Wolf Buddee said:

I have to agree with Hubert on this one. After the Concorde, the Connie, and for it’s day, the 262. Without a doubt the B-58 has a place here too.

I’ll never forget my flight on Concorde in 1986. Pure magic.

Cheers, Wolf

Expand  

Hi Wolf!!

  • Like 3
Posted
  On 12/26/2019 at 12:10 AM, harv said:

ah yes, the Connie ! I do love the looks of her.....harv

Expand  

Absolutely Harv, extremely elegant lines for a prop liner. From the tip of the nose, the arched fuselage, to the triple tail vertical stabs, she was one sharp lookin’ lady!

Cheers, Wolf

  • Like 3
Posted
  On 12/29/2019 at 10:05 AM, IainMackayDall said:

You either hate it, or love this one, for me it's the latter, even after they added all those refuelling pods and Küchemann carrot bulges on the wings.

Expand  

Taste differs :D, but I have to say, that the air intakes are a piece of art, the rest, ...

Cheers Rob

  • Like 3
  • Administrators
Posted

I do have some odd tastes in aircraft, but I doubt many will argue my choices.   The first is easily one of the most elegant designs ever to take flight, and the second is the most beautiful subsonic airliner ever to take flight. Like a VC-10, but just a bit more balanced.

I’d also mention the Mug-29, but Martin beat me to it.

 

2B88ECC0-532F-4CB7-823C-B64F0D6CFC28.jpeg

E412EEC3-D011-4742-99D4-DAF3BA8B4DCE.jpeg

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 1/1/2020 at 1:36 PM, DocRob said:

Taste differs :D, but I have to say, that the air intakes are a piece of art, the rest, ...

Cheers Rob

Expand  

Yes wing root intakes, must be a pain to build, but they look so streamlined and still futuristic. There are some on Facebook making 1/48 3d laser print builds of various V-Bombers, and showing their work at https://www.facebook.com/groups/vulcanvictorvaliant/
Rikki Wolfe 

72285497_678096982676815_854407082667933696_o.jpg

77311167_10214303716486856_4379026184009154560_o.jpg

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)
  On 1/2/2020 at 11:53 AM, IainMackayDall said:

Yes wing root intakes, must be a pain to build, but they look so streamlined and still futuristic. There are some on Facebook making 1/48 3d laser print builds of various V-Bombers, and showing their work at https://www.facebook.com/groups/vulcanvictorvaliant/
Rikki Wolfe 

72285497_678096982676815_854407082667933696_o.jpg

77311167_10214303716486856_4379026184009154560_o.jpg

Expand  

If anyone is into 3d printing I have a great model I commissioned from Milviz https://milviz.com/flight/index.php
it was not built for any flight sim, we could not get anyone into a cockpit back in 2010, and the model did get used in a 2011 publication front cover by Andrew Brookes. (The 3D model copy I have is in .FBX, .max, .DAE .c4d )

9781849083393.jpg

Edited by IainMackayDall
adjustment to content
  • Like 2
Posted

I have to say there was something uniquely sleek in the design of the Victor Mk 1 and Vulcan Mk 1.

It got worse with the Mk 2 versions of both.

Hubert

  • Like 3
  • Administrators
Posted

I AM a traditionalist, and I truly love the look of the big Valiant. It's one seriously gorgeous design that just looks right.

Of course, all the V Bombers looked "right", there wasn't an ugly bone in any of them.

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...