Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It certainly isn't high on my to-do list but I wouldn't say no if you handed the kit to me right now. As there isn't a huge amount of Russian aircraft in 1/32 once you subtract the variants of the existing stuff like the 200 different I-16 kits ICM has boxed so far, I would likely buy one eventually just to have another Russian plane so they don't feel outnumbered by the Japanese and Germans.

At the moment, however, I would like to see more Italian and non-fighter Japanese subjects but IBG don't do that and my sadness is not their problem.

But they could do a Pe-2 or -3 in 1/32, and if they want my money they better get on it muy rápido. Maybe if I buy enough P.11's they can fund the tooling?

  • Like 2
Posted

I think it's a great little plane. I'd be happy with it. I also like the IL 16.......harv

  • Like 1
Posted

I am actually in the middle of building one of their I-16s, and it's a nice kit but (and I chalk this entirely up to not being more than passing familiar with the variants) all the different subtypes look very similar. But then again, so did the VW Beetle from 1946 to 1979 pretty much and I am nuts about vintage VWs, so help yourself to an extra grain when taking what I say.

  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, [CAT]CplSlade said:

It certainly isn't high on my to-do list but I wouldn't say no if you handed the kit to me right now. As there isn't a huge amount of Russian aircraft in 1/32 once you subtract the variants of the existing stuff like the 200 different I-16 kits ICM has boxed so far, I would likely buy one eventually just to have another Russian plane so they don't feel outnumbered by the Japanese and Germans.

At the moment, however, I would like to see more Italian and non-fighter Japanese subjects but IBG don't do that and my sadness is not their problem.

But they could do a Pe-2 or -3 in 1/32, and if they want my money they better get on it muy rápido. Maybe if I buy enough P.11's they can fund the tooling?

If I may, the PZL P11 has NOTHING at all to do with Russian origin. PZL was a Polish company, founded by by the talented engineer Zulawski. It still exists today, and continue to produce some indignenous designs.

As for confounding Poland and Russia, considering the centuries-old antagonism between the two nations, and the still-existing lack of love between them, this might be viewed as a tad insensitive ... B)

Enough with pompous geo/historical lecturing :). This kit seems vey god news to me (even though I already have the SW kit in the stash ;) )

Hubert

  • Like 3
Posted

You're right; my bad. I had been talking about IBG and new Russian subjects earlier today and just carried it over in my mind when I read about this kit.

  • Like 3
Posted
On 6/9/2019 at 12:02 PM, [CAT]CplSlade said:

 As there isn't a huge amount of Russian aircraft in 1/32 once you subtract the variants of the existing stuff like the 200 different I-16 kits ICM has boxed so far,

 

Polska!  No Russki.

  • Like 2
Posted

This is very exciting news. I am becoming very keen of the mid war era fighters and injected P.11 would be great addition.

Thank You for sharing.

cheers

M.

full

  • Like 1
  • Administrators
Posted

P.11c = instant classic the moment is was built. There's something seriously gorgeous about that aircraft...    And if the back half of the fuselage looks familiar, it's because the entire rear half of the P.11 was used on the IAR.80 and 81 Romanian fighters.

  • Like 2
Posted
On 6/13/2019 at 6:00 AM, [CAT]CplSlade said:

I believe I already addressed my error, non-readers of previous posts that you are.

Ja, Ja...  but how often do I get to say “Polska!”?  And I only know one other Polish word!

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Martinnfb said:

In the early thirties this was actually, very revolutionary design .

9c0f85be0ae87058536501b8bd3431a1--ww-pla

Ask Marie Antoinette:  Was the revolution pretty?

  • Like 2
Posted
16 hours ago, Martinnfb said:

In the early thirties this was actually, very revolutionary design .

9c0f85be0ae87058536501b8bd3431a1--ww-pla

It's the transition form between bi- and monoplane in a way. Proof of evolution.

  • Like 2
Posted
13 hours ago, [CAT]CplSlade said:

It's the transition form between bi- and monoplane in a way. Proof of evolution.

That has been made earlier (1918) by Junkers (D1) at least as a full metal design and even earlier in different wooden styles by Fokker and others.

Cheers Rob

Bildergebnis für junkers d1

Picture for discussion purpose only

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...