Wingco57

I only know their 1/72 Whitley offering, bit if a mixed bag, the plastic was reasonable, good resin but Terrible clear parts, but that doesn't mean thus can't be a good effort. Nice choice. Cees

You are correct about that, not a clear answer. But then again I am not a 109 expert. Nor is any book the definitive standard. I like books where more attention is give to the technical side of things. In general looking at the photographs and drawings from the manual printed herein, I hope to get an idea of the shape involved. It usually take several books and many photographs to get a definitive idea. About this book, I liked the "feel" of it. Cees

Got it and liked it for the technical information. Would like to see more volumes in this style. Cees

What a great choice Ken, I will certainly get one. Like public transport, you wait for eternity and then.......... Cees

Just got back from Malta two hours ago. Saw the remains if BR108 and was heavily impressed about the fighting That took place there the scars are everyhere to see, even today. Great build Ralph. Cees

There's nothing like sawing a kit to bits...errr you know what I mean...... I hope. A great build showing how to understand a subject, using knowledge provided by others, with everyone learning. That way we are all winners, and Iain is doing the hardest part and enjoying himself immensely. Fantastic! This original topic is a pioneer, hope more like these will feature on LSM. Cees

My preferred brand too. And you have several " dirts" Cees

+1 Welcome Cees

Chaps, There is nothing wrong discussing this topic, as long as it is done in a civilized matter. We can all learn from the pros and cons of this very sensitive subject. I know I stirred this topic up a bit but just to get a sound discussion. A heated debate is not a bad thing as long as we all contribute as a team, and leave the ego's temporarily outside. So if the Revell 109 is not the definitive kit, what are the main anomalies to the original. Problem is that many 109's on show are restored and that can be a disadvantage sometimes. Apart from that during service a lot of airframes had non-standard fittings. Forced by unavailability or the personal wish of the pilot, who knows. When I was researching the Halifax I sought a certain standard that I could use for my project, I couldn't find any as most airframes differ from one machine to another. I was puzzled. The Heinkel 219 thread that was referred to was a good one where pics were posted to compare with the kit. That way a balanced understanding of the kit is created that we all can learn from, and especially enjoy. Everybody is entitled to build a kit as he/she wishes but to better understand the subject graphic images can support the debate. And it is fun to read, I know I do. Cees

Great opinions, keep them coming. Cees

Fair enough, because forums are always full of people slagging off model kits. I just like to see discussions balanced. Sorry, that's just me. Differences if opinion are great for discussion. It's not that I don't gree. It's the general state of things that as soon as test shots are released, these kits are put underneath A magnefying glass and everything is scrutinised. What I would like to see is proof that the spinner is not correct, using photo's Drawings or the original designers pencil. As opposed to (taken generally not aimed at anyone) stating something isn't correct without knowing what. Cees

I agree, but Revell has some nice prices that enables you to get some of those aftermarketsets without having to Get a bankloan. Something that is always bugging me is this: On forums people are eager to point out terminal errors on a new kit. Manufacturers can never do good. Even Tamiya Has aftermarket sets thrown upon them. But how many people who cry out about defects are in fact " experts". Or Even build the thing. Must be a case of the armchair and the clicking mouse. Ohoh Cees

Looks good, like a 109 Cees

Getting there Harv Cees

Good to see this one kitted, let's see the lesser known types represented in our scale too. Cees

Like the wear. Cees

I agree with Jeroen. It's large but not an aircraft or armour kit. This subject would be great for scale plastic and rail. Cees

I lost my Trumpeter Swordfish mk I, but got a Tamiya Lancaster (wrong scale I know) instead. Cees

Nick and Steve, Not aimed at anyone, but this kit isn't out yet. We all know that models at shows can be misleading. As soon as the definitive kit is released then the frenzy can begin. I fully agree that manufacturers can learn from the expertise on here, but wouldn't it be more effective to contact the manufacturer directly? Just my views. Cheers Cees

I think this topic fits better in the modelling discussion subforum. Great idea by the way Cees

Small update (no pics this time yet) Got very essential information from Alex Kontivis yesterday. His 1/48 build inspired me to do it in our scale. Very nice guy and a master modeller, thanks Alex. He sent copies of the Air Publication on Whitleys. Now I have sufficient information on the trimtabs, rudder mass balance and fin root fairings. Pics soon. Cees

Fantastic finish. Cees

Let's not jump to any conclusion as long as this chicken hasn't hatched yet. Too many forums doing that Already. Just wait and see what Revell delivers. Cees

Humbrol clearfax perhaps, it is rather thick and may fill the hole in one go. Cees

Fantastic progress, touch wood. Cees