Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Since I had a false start on this build I decided I'd start a whole new thread. I still plan to do Pengie II so let the work begin! :)

 

10-17 002.jpg

  • Like 7
Posted

Comparing the Hasegawa fuselage to the Trumpeter I find two "issues". The tail on the Trumpeter kit is taller than the Hasegawa. Also, the fuselage is deeper. My guess would be the Trumpeter is a bit off.

 

11-15 006.jpg

11-15 2 001.jpg

  • Like 5
Posted

Having built the Trumpeter Jug my main piece of advice would be to join the spine inserts to the fuselage halves and then join them, rather than as the instructions show. Gets you a far neater finish.

Looking forward to seeing what you do with this.

  • Like 5
Posted
14 minutes ago, GusMac said:

Having built the Trumpeter Jug my main piece of advice would be to join the spine inserts to the fuselage halves and then join them, rather than as the instructions show. Gets you a far neater finish.

Looking forward to seeing what you do with this.

Thanks for the info. :)

  • Like 4
Posted
2 hours ago, Clunkmeister said:

Can this be built without all the goofy turbocharger ducting in place?   

Either way, I'm looking forward to seeing this develop

That is my intention Ernie. A waste of plastic. :)

  • Like 2
Guest DannyVM
Posted

I'm at the front row to watch John.:popcorn:

Posted
10 hours ago, DannyVM said:

I'm at the front row to watch John.:popcorn:

I just hope it turns out half as nice as your "Dottie Mae" build. :)

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, MARU 5137 said:

John...

 

I love watching our builds... this is gonna be great...

 

Thank you.:151_41_44_712.09472830013627761

Onward and upward as they say Maru. :)

Posted

JOhn

Nothing like following a Jug build. As always, will be following every step of the way. Thanks for posting the comparison photos, food for thought as always on how manufactures determine the shape, size and details.

Keep 'em comin

Peter

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Peterpools said:

how manufactures determine the shape, size and details.

Surely they must source original or copies the subject in question? Ok injection moulding and cost can negate certain details but verbal shape and mass of fuselage and wings can’t be difficult, IMHO.........

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Peterpools said:

JOhn

Nothing like following a Jug build. As always, will be following every step of the way. Thanks for posting the comparison photos, food for thought as always on how manufactures determine the shape, size and details.

Keep 'em comin

Peter

As soon as I get well along or completed Hasegawa or Tamiya will announce a razorback. LOL :)

  • Like 2
Guest DannyVM
Posted
On 11/16/2018 at 7:08 PM, JohnB said:

I just hope it turns out half as nice as your "Dottie Mae" build. :)

No worries John, all the work i've seen from you was always superbly done mate, this one will be no exception.:respect:

Posted
5 hours ago, DannyVM said:

No worries John, all the work i've seen from you was always superbly done mate, this one will be no exception.:respect:

Thanks Danny. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...