Drifter Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 Sign me up: I'll go twice and buy a Lanc. 3
Wumm Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 That just seems so cold and impersonal. I think I'd want dinner and a movie first, thanks! 2
GazzaS Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 At the end there, I was wondering what a "Bonararium" was. Silly me... Honorarium. There was a speck on my monitor. Too many possibilities for this one...lol 2
Jeff Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 I really could take this and run with it, but in light of a possible younger crowd here.................................... BUT I would be happy to participate in this 'study'.............. 3
1to1scale Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 Those crazy Canadians, they probably could have collected money! 3
Jeff Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 Somehow it will COST us something...... it usually does 2
Wumm Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 3 hours ago, Jeff said: BUT I would be happy to participate in this 'study'.............. Well, I just hope you get a Lady volunteer is all Jeff! 3
Martinnfb Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 Exactly, this can be particularly tricky business, especially in Canada..... 2
Wumm Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 Ideally, I suspect the recipient should have a wide vocal range, and preferably be multi-lingual to explore the full effects of the testing parameters... someone from Quebec perhaps? However, I'm surprised that the test liquid isn't simply administered directly from a sterile cup or beaker. This seems a far more controlled method, and of course eliminates the chance of inadvertantly being blinded by Science. 5
HubertB Posted December 18, 2018 Posted December 18, 2018 Having always been fascinated by science and scientific experiments, I have to dig this one But one thing is unclear to me. I can fairly well understand the masculine « donor » side of the test. But what about the « receiver » part of it ? No mention is made of who, and how ... (which, btw, leaves some space for a surprise, if candidates imagine one given gender for the receiver, and get the other gender ) All of this to say the experimental protocol is poorly defined at this stage, and needs to be reworked on before the study’s results can be published in « Science » or the « New England Journal of Medicine » (Very serious) Hubert 3
Jeff Posted December 18, 2018 Posted December 18, 2018 20 hours ago, Wumm said: Well, I just hope you get a Lady volunteer is all Jeff! ..................ah..................................... maybe I had better not be to 'hasty' in volunteering........................................... 2
GusMac Posted December 18, 2018 Posted December 18, 2018 I can see an Ig Nobel prize waiting for this one in the near future... 4
Wumm Posted December 18, 2018 Posted December 18, 2018 After further consideration, it would seem that the reason the liquid is not taken from a receptacle, is that there must also be some form of Coronal/Epiglotal contact required to fully explore all scenarios expected to be encountered within the general population. Therefore, unfortunately I find that I would be unsuitable as a Candidate for this experiment, as my genetic makeup is overwhelmingly Anglo-Saxon in origin. 4
krow113 Posted December 18, 2018 Posted December 18, 2018 Finally , scientific validation for The Glory Hole. 3
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now